An analysis of the left-back situation after injuries to Gibbs and Traore
Written by Jeff Patterson on August 18, 2011 9:00
When Arsenal announced the sale of Gael Clichy this summer, a majority of Gooners seemed to view his departure as an acceptable loss. A 7m deal for a player with only a year remaining on his contract, and a defender who was at times, prone to errors in defense.
Fans were much less accepting of the news that manager Arsene Wenger planned not to invest in strengthening the left-back position. Instead, Wenger pronounced his faith that Kieran Gibbs and Armand Traore were ready for promotion to the first team.
To Arsene’s credit, Gibbs and Traore have both looked the part skill-wise in this early season, Gibbs especially has been surprising, though the occasional mental lapse on defense isn’t exactly uncommon. Traore was solid as well, especially as a more defensive option.
The biggest issue I have with this decision is the same concern I’ve had since Arsene first made this decision. Neither Gibbs, nor Traore has proven that they can be reliable solutions at fullback. Gibbs has always looked promising, but has never been able keep himself healthy for any length of time. Traore has bounced around on loan, and has never really found a place, as a loanee or as a Gunner.
Unfortunately, this decision came back to haunt Arsene on Tuesday night, and I believe it won’t be for the last time. Traore suffered an injury in a reserve match, and thus was not in the squad and Kieran Gibbs suffered another of his mysteriously sudden injuries against Udinese. Arsenal spent the entire second half playing “cut-and-paste” with the back four, and were somewhat lucky not to concede, although they did lose Johan Djourou to injury as well.
So now, with the Premier League not even into its second week, Arsene is faced with the possibility of being without three of the eight players that comprise our defensive department.
At left-back, if neither Gibbs or Traore is fit to start, Wenger will have to choose between Thomas Vermaelen or 19-year old Carl Jenkinson. Vermaelen is probably the best choice at fullback, but that of course would mean that the walking-disaster himself, Sebastian Squillaci, would likely make his first start of the season.
To compound the problems, Arsenal will be without Alex Song, meaning that Emmanuel Frimpong will likely be given his first Premier League start.
This is a situation that is quickly getting ridiculous, and the reinforcements need to be brought in quick. Last year at this time, Arsenal seemed a squad overflowing with talent. This year’s edition seems stretched to beyond all that was thought possible, and with Eboue gone, and Nasri and Bendtner possibly following him, it looks to get thinner still.



Arsenal News 24/7



nah thanks but no thanks… Verm can go LB when we have enough CBs fit… we just need Gorcouff and Hazard, and we will be running riots in premiership…. oh, and get rid off rosicky and chamack! i rather keep Bendtner than Chamack
——————–wos———
–sagna–Kos-verm–Traore-
—————Song——-
—-Walcott-Wilshere-Gervinho-
————–Gorcouff——-
———-RVP—–
Subs:
1.Vitto
2.Djourou
3.Hazard (£30 mill will do)
4.Arshavin
5.Ramsey
6.Frimpong
This team will have you on the edge of your seat, like the good old days! but has wenger got any bottle to make decisive decisions or will he just dither!??!